Jami-Lee Ross leaves more questions than answers

What should have been the end of the protracted Simon Bridges leak saga has led to further questions, writes Laura Walters.

An explosive press conference from ousted National MP Jami-Lee Ross should have provided the answers to questions swirling since August, but Ross’ attack on Bridges only raised more questions.

On Monday, Bridges released the findings of a PwC report into the leaking of his travel expenses, and subsequent events. The report was not conclusive, but on the balance of probabilities, found Ross was the leaker.

Ross has flat-out denied being the leaker and has gone down swinging, levelling serious allegations at Bridges, which included corrupt electoral donation practices.

While the remaining National MPs were in a crisis caucus meeting voting to expel the “lone wolf MP” from the party, Ross was using a podium set up for Bridges to publicly announce his resignation and mount his next attack on his former ally.

With allegations flying and MPs resigning, here’s a list of what we now know, and what’s yet to come out in the wash:

Expenses leaker

Ross denies being the original leaker of Bridges’ travel expenses. The expenses were leaked to a Newshub journalist in August and the PwC report commissioned by Bridges showed no correspondence between Ross and the journalist. The report said the leaker had not been identified “with certainty”, but the evidence pointed to Ross.

Bridges and National MPs were firm on their belief that Ross was behind all the recent leaks, saying there had been a “pattern of behaviour”. There was also no alternative MP or staffer identified as the possible source.

Text leaker

Ross has admitted to being the leaker of the text from the person claiming to be the expense leaker (stay with us). The text calling for the leak inquiry to be called off was leaked to a different journalist, from a different organisation. Ross said he passed the details of the text to the RNZ journalist because he disagreed with Bridges’ decisions regarding the leak saga, including his decision to push forward with an investigation despite the leaker revealing they had mental health issues.

The report details 10 calls between Ross and the RNZ journalist, and nine calls between Ross and a senior police officer in his electorate. He says the calls to the police officer were on an unrelated matter. It seems no one in National, nor the report authors, believe this.

Harassment allegations

Ross is also now facing allegations of harassing at least four women. He was confronted by Bridges, deputy leader Paula Bennett, and National chief of staff Jamie Gray about three weeks ago. They said there were complaints from four women, and they were aware of a “pattern of behaviour”. Bridges said the women did not want to take the matter further.

Meanwhile, allegations regarding Ross’ behaviour in his Botany electorate have surfaced. Issues were taken to the National Party executive by members of the Howick Local Board on more than one occasion. No action was taken.

Ross denies ever harassing a woman, saying he was raised by his mother and grandmother to respect women. He then strangely referenced the Brett Kavanaugh affair in the US, saying a man who was accused of harassment these days found it almost impossible to clear their name. Ross said these allegations led to him having a “mental breakdown” and caused him to take leave. He said he was better now.

Last night Bennett told Newsroom it was wrong of Ross to claim she and Bridges had raised allegations of sexual 'harassment' with him. "We just put to him some form of inappropriate behaviour for a married man. We had a private conversation with him. It was sensitive, but it is him who has chosen to go public about it being around sexual harassment."

Electoral return allegations

Clearly not one to go down without a fight, Ross levelled his own allegations at Bridges over his dealing with electoral returns.

Ross said Bridges filed false returns for electoral donations. One of those was a $10,000 donation from an organisation called Cathedral Club, which Ross alleged was a front for Bridges' friend. Bridges said there was a clerical error regarding two donations totalling $24,000, as they were listed as candidate donations, rather than party donations. The return was amended and resubmitted.

Ross also alleged Bridges had received $100,000 from Chinese businessman Yikun Zhang, which Bridges asked Ross to collect and split up so it could be filed anonymously. The outgoing National MP said he would be taking information regarding the alleged "corruption" to police on Wednesday.

Bridges denied any corruption or wrongdoing and said he welcomed an investigation.

National Party president Peter Goodfellow said the party could find no proof of Ross' allegations, which seemed "inconsistent with the donor information we have to date, including information previously supplied by Mr Ross".

Jami-Lee Ross’ future

Ross has resigned as a member of the National Party and as a member of Parliament. He will stand in the Botany by-election as an independent. National will also stand a candidate in the election, and it’s unlikely Ross will win. At this stage, his future remains up in the air.

Simon Bridges’ future

Bridges’ handling of the leak saga, and his popularity both in and out of the party, have been questioned during the past two months. The leader said the party was united and all 55 MPs had voted to expel Ross. He also said his leadership had not been discussed by caucus but the party was united. He repeatedly referred to Ross as a “lone-wolf MP”, who was “leaking”, “lying” and “lashing out”.

However, this will not be the end of the saga for Bridges, who may now be at the centre of an investigation into alleged electoral fraud. He's in a stronger position than Ross at this stage but nothing's a sure thing in politics.

Can you help our journalists uncover the facts?

Newsroom is committed to giving our journalists the time they need to uncover, investigate, and fact-check tough stories. Reader donations are critical to buying our team the time they need to produce high-quality independent journalism.

If you can help us, please donate today.


Newsroom does not allow comments directly on this website. We invite all readers who wish to discuss a story or leave a comment to visit us on Twitter or Facebook. We also welcome your news tips and feedback via email: contact@newsroom.co.nz. Thank you.

With thanks to our partners