FMA ‘don’t know what they’re doing’ - burned currency trader

A currency trader who lost $70,000 in a sharp, short-lived downturn, thinks the currency market is not properly regulated.

The trader, who RNZ Business spoke to on the condition of anonymity, said his broker automatically closed out his risk-free position on the New Zealand and Australian dollars during a brief crash in the currency market in January.

He said he complained to the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) about the broker's action but did not get proper consideration of the matter, and felt the Authority was asleep at the wheel and had little knowledge of the foreign exchange market.

"I do not think they know what they are doing."

The trader argued that, while he had not understood the broker's terms and conditions, he did not feel he was fairly treated, even though he was partially compensated by the broker for his losses.

"I just want to issue a warning to other foreign exchange traders that there is a fatal flaw in the system. Brokers can legally steal client's money in a flash crash," the trader said.

RNZ Business has seen emails from the chief executive of the FMA, Rob Everett, responding to the trader's complaint, in which he said it was not the FMA's role to provide advice or agitate on his behalf.

In a statement, an FMA spokesperson said it was policy not to comment on individual complaints for confidentiality reasons and in this instance did not know the substance of the complaint.

"We are confident we have robust processes for dealing with complaints and that we have the necessary expertise and experience to judge the complaints we receive, both from the public and market participants."

He said it received hundreds of complaints every year and there were cases with insufficient information, evidence, or no legal basis to take action.

"We must always test the public interest in determining whether we need to escalate a complaint and establish an investigation into potential misconduct."

The spokesperson said the FMA balanced whether there was sufficient evidence to show a legal breach, against the resources and funding needed to take action.

"In many of the complaints we receive that test is not reached."

This article was originally published on RNZ and re-published with permission.

Can you help our journalists uncover the facts?

Newsroom is committed to giving our journalists the time they need to uncover, investigate, and fact-check tough stories. Reader donations are critical to buying our team the time they need to produce high-quality independent journalism.

If you can help us, please donate today.


Newsroom does not allow comments directly on this website. We invite all readers who wish to discuss a story or leave a comment to visit us on Twitter or Facebook. We also welcome your news tips and feedback via email: Thank you.

With thanks to our partners